Before I get started, let me ask everyone reading this one question. "Have you ever seen a fat sprinter?" Think about this question while you read this post and I will explain why I asked it at the end.
The results of a study of trained cyclists will help to explain why this
myth is incorrect. Basically, a group of cyclists rode at a moderate intensity
while the amount of each substrate (energy source) being used was measured.
At the one hour period, they were still deriving over 60% of the calories
burned from carbohydrate. Of the approx. 40% fat being burned, only 27%
came from fat cells while the other 13% came from intramuscular fat. This
merely serves to point out that it can take upwards of an hour for fat
to be a major energy source during exercise. We'll see later on that it
may not matter with respect to fat loss. To read about a sports drink
that will help you burn fat right from the start of exercise click here
A study was done at Georgia State U. on very well trained aerobics teachers. They stepped for approx 40 minutes (about the length of a typical step class) while the source of energy was measured as above. Mind you, these were extremely well trained teachers and the intensity of their exercise was approx 60% of their max, which is fairly low. Of the total energy expended, over 90% came directly from carbohydrate with only a small amount coming from fat. This draws some serious doubt on both the above myths. We'll also see later that this doesn't matter for fat loss.
The myth of low intensity exercise being better for fat loss is erroneous for this reason. Yes, it is true that you burn a greater percentage of fat during low intensity exercise (actually you burn the greatest percentage of fat during sleep which is the ultimate in low intensity activity). However, the total number of calories burned is less so the absolute number of fat calories burned is less. During high intensity exercise, you burn a lower percentage of fat calories but a higher absolute number of fat calories due to the higher number of total calories burned. You also get done faster.
At this point, I'm guessing that you're saying "Well, if I can only burn fat if I exercise an hour or more, why should I bother?" This brings us to the final myth.
Two very similar studies have found evidence that this is simply not the case. One was done at UCLA while the other was performed at Georgia State U. Both had two groups exercising at either a very high intensity or a very low intensity. The exercise was standardized so that both groups burned the same number of calories.One group exercised approx. 50 minutes at a very low intensity (~50% VO2max) while the other exercised approx. 25 minutes at a very high intensity (~90% VO2 max). Well, based on the pervading myths, only the low intensity group should have lost fat. But, at the end of 18 week, bodyfat loss was identical. Now you're saying "But if the high intensity group burned only carbs, how did they lose fat?" They don't really know. However, what seems to be important is the caloric deficit rather than the manner of burning the calories.
So, how about our sprinter. Well, sprinters, who tend to be phenomenally lean break all of the supposed rules for fat loss. They do lots of short duration, high intensity work, burning only carbs during exercise. However, their bodyfat levels are extremely low.
Now, am I recommending that everyone go out and start running sprints to lose fat? Well, no. First and foremost, high intensity exercise greatly increases the chance for injury, especially if you are just starting out. Second, high intensity exercise is very uncomfortable. If you are just starting, you will not continue exercising if you put yourself through lots of unenjoyable and painful exercise. However, assuming you have been working out a sufficient amount of time to be physically able to do high intensity work, you will definitely see greater fat loss by exercising at a higher intensity because you will be burning more calories for a given time period. This is especially important for those people who have a given amount of time that they can exercise. In order to burn more calories they should increase the intensity since they cannot increase the time.
If you have ever worked out at a gym you may have noticed treadmill ergometer notations of "fat burning zone" in the area of 65% of maximum heart rate. And if your workout is generally at a higher intensity, you may have wondered whether you may be running too fast to burn fat. Nothing could be more ridiculous.The idea that low intensity aerobic activities are better for fat burning than high intensity exercise was given credence when several research studies indicated that low intensity activities burned a greater percentage of fat calories than high intensity activities.
These studies validated that the body prefers to use fat as its fuel source during low-intensity exercise. This equates roughly to 60% of the total calories burned, as opposed to about 40% from high intensity exercise.
While this fuel preference is true, it is misguided to believe that the selective use of fat for fuel will translate into burning more total fat calories. High-intensity exercise burns more fat calories, as well as carbohydrate calories, on an absolute basis than lower intensity activities. Because an important aspect of training intensity is the total amount of fat calories burned--not the percentage from fat--higher intensity exercise has the decided edge. Further, reduced body fat results from total calorie deficits--that is, burning more calories than you take in from your foods.
When you consider the time-related efficiency of training, low-intensity exercise provides a very poor cost/benefit dividend. You burn about the same number of calories walking a mile as running a mile--it just takes a bit longer walking them off. If fat burning is one of your aims, performing cardiovascular exercise at a higher intensity gives you more bang for your workout buck.
You may also find the following links to resources on this website to be of interest:You will be amazed at what Hornet Juice will do to your atheltic performance. We guarantee it will boost your energy like no other sports drink you have tried before, or you can have your money back.
But don't take our word for it, you can read 100% genuine customer testimonials from many Hornet Juice users here.
If Hornet Juice powered gold medal wins at the Sydney and Athens Olympics in the womens' marathon then it must be good for your athletic performance too, right?
Hornet Juice works with your existing sports nutrition program. The focus of normal sports nutrition is to replace energy that has been lost through exercise. Hornet Juice works differently in that it taps into your body's most abundant and underutilized energy source - fat.
You can receive a starter pack of 4 servings for only $9 plus there is no charge for shipping and handling.
If you're still not sure, take your time to read through our FAQ section here.
Boost your athletic performance and join the Hornet Juice team today! To read more click here
Use Fat for Energy
Hornet Juice burns fat to increase your atheltic endurance.
New Testimonials
"... As I ran today, after I took Hornet Juice, I
decreased my time by 10 minutes, and went the extra mileage that I needed
to for my upcoming marathon... I would encourage all runners to try this
fabulous product!"...
$9 Starter Pack
Get 4 serves, info booklet, free S&H, plus a money-back guarantee for only $9.
Blog Buzz
Special offers, announcements and other cool stuff to keep you in the loop!
FREE Shipping
Remember, all orders are sent to your doorstep free of charge...